![]() |
| Little girls are expected to dream of their wedding days |
The issue of marriage appears throughout many of Edith
Wharton’s novels and short stories. At
the heart of marriage in her stories is the idea of female sexuality and all of
the underlying issues that go along with it.
Some of those ideas include purity and innocence, which are connected to
morality as a whole. The idea held by
Edwardians, and Westerners of any time pe
There is a double standard to this belief. Men endure no snide looks or haughty whispers
if they are outwardly sexual. Men are
not seen as bad people because they have had sexual experiences outside of
marriage, but their female partners are.
These ideas about sexual innocence are not limited to young, unmarried
women; even married women are expected to maintain a certain level of naivety. If women use their bodies or knowledge to
manipulate a situation for their own advantage they are seen as overly sexual
and improper.
riod, including today, for that matter, is that if a woman has any sort of sexual experience or is unashamed of her sexuality, she is somehow immoral.
riod, including today, for that matter, is that if a woman has any sort of sexual experience or is unashamed of her sexuality, she is somehow immoral.
![]() |
| A photograph of young Edith Jones (later known as Edith Wharton) |
The relationship between female sexuality and class are
interwoven in Wharton’s short story “The Other Two.” In the story, Waythorn, the protagonist, gets
to know his wife Alice’s two ex-husbands.
He does business with her second husband Mr. Varick, who is fairly
wealthy and is aggressive in business and in his social interactions. Waythorn is not particularly fond of Mr.
Varick, but he doesn’t dislike him. Waythorn soon finds that Alice’s first
husband Mr. Haskett, with whom she has a daughter, has always been poor, and is
even more so now that he has left his job and moved to New York so that he can
be closer to his daughter.
Assuming her to have been the wronged partner in her
divorces, Waythorn pities her for her supposed innocence. Because of his predisposition to assume that
women are innocent and unable to protect themselves against or stand up against
men, he believes Alice must have somehow been the victim in an unhappy
marriage. He thinks of her as naïve and
in need of being rescued by a wealthy, intelligent man of the world. He
doesn’t think of her as a divorced woman – instead he thinks of her as a
helpless girl who was wronged by one man and needs to be saved by another. After he meets her ex-husbands, he gets to
see who they truly are. He sees that
while Mr. Haskett is poor, he is a soft-spoken, kind and caring man. Alice did not leave him because he was
abusive or neglectful. So she must have
left him for some other reason. She then
went to Mr. Varick, who is somewhat abrasive, so it is more obvious to both
Waythorn and the reader why she would have left him. But we wonder why she married him in the
first place. This shows Waythorn that Alice
was not actually a victim in her marriages. Each of her marriages was in fact a stepping-stone
in reaching a higher level of economic and social standing.
Wharton reveals Alice’s ascent through the classes with
diction that she uses to describe Alice.
She describes Alice as “the pretty Mrs. Haskett whom Gus Varick had
unearthed somewhere” (17). Keep in mind
this is narrated through the bias of Waythorn.
So not only does it reveal Waythorn’s classist viewpoints, but it also
shows how far up the class system Alice has traveled. Varick brought her from the depths of poverty
into the sunlit world of society. It is
only through their relationship that Alice was allowed into upper-class
circles. And she is very successful in
this. Wharton states, “Alice Haskett’s
remarriage with Gus Varick was a passport to the set whose recognition she
coveted, and for a few years the Varicks were the most popular couple in town”
(17). While Wharton does come out and
say that Alice wanted to advance in social status and that her marriage allowed
her to do so, the reader does not assume that this was her sole reason for
marrying Varick. Because this is only
the second page of the story and Wharton has otherwise only introduced Alice
through the honeymoon-clouded eyes of Waythorn, we as readers don’t think much
of her social advancement. We don’t
assume that she uses her marriage as a tool.
We merely look at her status change as a perk. It is only as Waythorn leaves the honeymoon phase
and gets to know his wife and her ex-husbands that he and the reader are able
to infer that Alice planned her marriages so that she could gain wealth and
status.
![]() |
| Annie Leibowitz's imagining of "The Other Two" for Vogue, September 2012 |
Edwardian ideas about women’s sexuality and classism might
seem strict, but they shouldn’t seem that unfamiliar. The fact of the matter is these ideas are
still highly prevalent today. Women in
authority who exert their authority are seen as “bossy” or “bitchy” while men
in the same position are seen as “strong” and “respectable.” Why do people dislike women who speak up for
themselves? Why are women who do not get
married and have children seen as selfish?
The stigma of divorced women that Wharton presents in “The Other Two” is
still existent today. Divorced women are
not necessarily less desirable to men as they once were. But divorced women who date are often judged,
especially if they have children. People
often think that divorced women should devote all of their free time to their
children, because they should be nurturing and selfless. They then go out of their way to make those
women feel guilty for wanting to be loved by someone other than their
children. Why are women who are open
about their sexual experience “slut-shamed” while men who do the same thing are
revered? Because people today still
expect women to live up to the expectations that were held during Wharton’s
lifetime. They are afraid that women will
claim their own autonomy and rise up out of the lower status position that they
have been placed in. Society still
believes women should be sweet, soft-spoken, family-oriented, naïve, and
helpless. Because he believes women
should be this way, Waythorn assumes his wife was naïve and helpless in her
first two marriages. He then gets to
know her and realizes that she accomplishes the goals that she sets for herself
that are not dictated to her by other people, so his view of her decreases. Just like in Wharton’s time, society still
dictates what a woman should and shouldn’t do because society believes that
women are incapable of making decisions for themselves. Everyone thinks that they have to tell the
naive, helpless woman what is best for her.



I think that this writing is great. It is very intresting to consider the differences between men and women's sexuality. I belive that women are forced into certain roles to be afraid of who they are because for years they have been told that their sexuality should only belong to me. It is very disheartens to think that despite it being an Edwardian idea, that it is still going on today.
ReplyDeleteI belive that women are also constantly ostriches for speaking out because of what we define a woman's beauty as. Sometimes if a woman is too manly then she is not as beautiful. It seems like to society women have to act a certain way to be loved and welcomed as a respectful and well adjusted member of society. However, the question can still be asked, why exactly do we still enforce these roles? Why do we still allow for this to be a problem? If we want to make a change, there has to be more action instead of just theories right? We have to step up and have a real dialouge with young women and men, starting at a young age, so that we can help them understand that these ideas about women's sexuality is something that has to be reconsidered.
Katlyn Lamar
I really like your writing and how thorough you are about bringing up details from the story to explain your points which I also find very valid!
ReplyDeleteI also like how you point out that "if a woman has any sort of sexual experience or is unashamed of her sexuality, she is some how immoral" and about how there are double standards regarding this standard of women to that of men. I find it sad how this is still an issue today, but has evolved into different terms such as "slut shaming" and whatnot.
Adding on to your questions at the end, I think that women are looked down on for speaking up for themselves because being a docile female is the norm in such a patriarchal society. Men are probably afraid of being emasculated, considering how fragile modern masculinity tends to be. For centuries, women were often the ones to be kept at home so that they could take care of the house and raise the children, so that ideal/standard is still ingrained into our society. It's EXPECTED for a woman to want to get married, to dream about her wedding day. It's EXPECTED that they should have and raise children to continue the human race, but as times change and as population increases, these desires change, but these expectations barely do, so that's why I find society to have problematic expectations.
I found your blog post to be very interesting! I liked the fact that you tied marriage into the class systems but also how you were able to squeeze men into the blog was a smart choice. Talking about social ladders and how climbing it can be such a hard thing to do and how one little thing can mess things up.
ReplyDeleteYou do a great job going into detail when mentioning the short story and explaining it. Up to the very end, were you started talking about our society, I felt as if you needed to connect with the audience more. The whole top half of the article felt as if you were writing an essay almost and at the very end you were able to let lose and it was actually interesting. My favorite part of the blog was "The fact of the matter is these ideas are still highly prevalent today. Women in authority who exert their authority are seen as “bossy” or “bitchy” while men in the same position are seen as “strong” and “respectable.”" This in a way is true and I think you hit that dead on, I just feel that you could have gone more into it. Maybe add something in between each paragraph to draw your audience into the subject.
This was a very insightful read on gender roles. I would have never thought that socioeconomic status still heavily affects how women must act, whether physically or mentally, in today's society and the past. I like the idea that her status change is a "perk" as you put it, and further illustrates this idea that women have to go up and up the social ladder, greatly diminshing their who they are compared to men, who often have a much easier time. I would like to comment that I feel this short story is Wharton's way of breaking this social stereotype of women simply being a commodity back in the early 1900s and simply becoming more independent and intellectual. I also see a lot of the stigma of women, in this place of power, seen as "bossy" and I feel like you can delve more into that, especially with the rise of women in education (I think more women receive college degrees than men nowadays).
ReplyDelete